| Field
Evaluation of Different Guidance Systems
Currently there are many different guidance systems
available in the market place. This research evaluated
six commercially available guidance systems for overall
performance in a series of field tests. The six systems
were Cultiva, Mid-Tech, Outback, Raven, Satloc and Trimble.
All systems used WAAS as a source of differential signal
except one system, which used the OmniStar signal as
a reference for comparison to the WAAS signal. The data
collected was evaluated by examining the mean error
and standard deviation of error calculated from the
differences in actual position of the tractor relative
to the calculated (desired) position. Other subjective
factors such as ease of installation, operator interaction
with the equipment and operational considerations were
also considered in the study.
More...
Investigators: Reza Ehsani, Matthew Sullivan, Joel
Walker, Tom Zimmerman, Food, Agricultural and Biological
Engineering
Contact: Reza Ehsani
Current Projects | Past
Projects
|